Normal view
MARC view
Entry Topical Term
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
- control field: 86203
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
- control field: OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
- control field: 20191028105704.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS
- fixed length control field: 041018i| anannbabn |a ana
010 ## - LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CONTROL NUMBER
- LC control number: sh2001002975
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
- System control number: 412392
- Canceled/invalid system control number: oca05499752
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
- Original cataloging agency: DLC
- Language of cataloging: eng
- Transcribing agency: DLC
- Modifying agency: DLC
053 #0 - LC CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
- Classification number element--single number or beginning number of span: Q172.5.P77
150 ## - HEADING--TOPICAL TERM
- Topical term or geographic name entry element: Pseudoscience
450 ## - SEE FROM TRACING--TOPICAL TERM
- Topical term or geographic name entry element: Junk science
550 ## - SEE ALSO FROM TRACING--TOPICAL TERM
- Topical term or geographic name entry element: Science
- Control subfield: g
670 ## - SOURCE DATA FOUND
- Source citation: Work cat.: 2001024426: Quantum leaps in the wrong direction : where real science ends and pseudoscience begins, c2001.
670 ## - SOURCE DATA FOUND
- Source citation: Web. 3
- Information found: (pseudoscience: a system of theories, assumptions, and methods erroneously regarded as scientific)
670 ## - SOURCE DATA FOUND
- Source citation: Random House
- Information found: (pseudoscience)
670 ## - SOURCE DATA FOUND
- Source citation: Wikipedia, Oct. 18, 2004
- Information found: (pseudoscience: any body of knowledge purported to be scientific or supported by science but which fails to comply with the scientific method. Pseudoscience is a kind of counterfeit or masquerade of science which makes use of some of the superficial trappings of science but does not involve the substance of science. Junk science: a term used to derogate purportedly scientific data, research, alayses, or clasims which are driven by political, financial or other questionable motives. Like many other ideological terms, there is often no political agreement as to which side of a debate constitutes 'junk,' and which 'real' science, though the scientiric community may have a overwhelming majority opinion. Public debates on environmental and health issues seem particularly prone to this problem.)